A. To put it simply: the number of revisions matters less than the quality of remaining tissue and the precision of the surgical plan. That said, each successive surgery does increase complexity.

​

Here's why.

​

1. Cumulative tissue degradation. Each revision surgery adds scar tissue (fibrosis), reduces cartilage reserves, and progressively compromises skin quality. With every operation, the pool of available donor material shrinks, limiting reconstructive options.

​

2. The need for alternative graft sources. By the third revision, septal cartilage is frequently depleted. At this stage, surgeons must turn to conchal cartilage (from the ear) or autologous costal cartilage (rib). Costal cartilage provides abundant volume and can be carved into virtually any graft shape.

​

3. Surgical design over surgical count. What matters most is not "how many times" but "is this surgery correctly diagnosing the problem and executing the right solution?" A single, well-designed revision performed by an experienced specialist consistently outperforms multiple poorly planned attempts.

​

---

​

Why the Closed Approach Makes a Difference

​

The closed technique is especially beneficial in the revision setting. By accessing the nose exclusively through endonasal incisions, the surgeon avoids inflicting additional injury on already-compromised skin. The technique preserves the subdermal vascular plexus, uses virtually no electrocautery, and produces minimal bleeding. For patients who have undergone multiple prior operations, this principle of tissue conservation is not a preference — it is a necessity.

​

---

​

When to Be Cautious

​

- A history of postoperative infection, severely thinned skin, or extensive septal damage significantly raises the risk profile of additional surgery.

- In such cases, allowing 6–12 months of healing for tissue stabilization before proceeding with revision is strongly recommended.

- Rushing the timeline increases the risk of complications including skin necrosis, graft malposition, and infection.

- Patients must disclose their full surgical history, medications, smoking status, and any prior complications.

​

---

​

What I've Observed in Clinical Practice

​

In my experience, even tertiary and quaternary revisions (3rd and 4th) can yield satisfying outcomes when the underlying cause of dissatisfaction is accurately identified and the appropriate graft material is selected. For patients with near-complete septal cartilage loss, I employ autologous costal cartilage septal reconstruction — harvesting rib cartilage to fabricate a new structural septum.

​

---

​

Surgeon's Note

​

If you've had multiple surgeries, the priority this time is not just "fixing the shape" — it's understanding why the previous results were unsatisfactory. As a surgeon who has performed all revision and reconstructive rhinoplasty exclusively through the closed technique, I place great importance on addressing both function and structural integrity in every procedure.

​

---

​

Summary

- Surgical outcome depends more on residual tissue quality and plan precision than on revision count

- After 3+ revisions, costal cartilage or other autologous alternatives are often required

- The closed approach minimizes cumulative tissue trauma in multi-revision patients